Hi Steve,
On 2019/12/17 22:33, Steven Price wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 01:55:47PM +0000, yezengruan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Implement the service call for configuring a shared structure between a
>> vcpu and the hypervisor in which the hypervisor can tell the vcpu is
>> running or not.
>>
>> The preempted field is zero if 1) some old KVM deos not support this filed.
>> 2) the vcpu is not preempted. Other values means the vcpu has been preempted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
>> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 8 ++++++++
>> virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c | 4 ++++
>> virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 556cd818eccf..098375f1c89e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -356,6 +356,19 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_is_pvtime_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void kvm_arm_pvlock_preempted_init(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool kvm_arm_is_pvlock_preempted_ready(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void kvm_update_pvlock_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 preempted)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
>>
>> struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index c61260cf63c5..d9b2a21a87ac 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -354,6 +354,11 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> u64 last_steal;
>> gpa_t base;
>> } steal;
>> +
>> + /* Guest PV lock state */
>> + struct {
>> + gpa_t base;
>> + } pv;
>> };
>>
>> /* Pointer to the vcpu's SVE FFR for sve_{save,load}_state() */
>> @@ -515,6 +520,18 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_is_pvtime_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch)
>> return (vcpu_arch->steal.base != GPA_INVALID);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void kvm_arm_pvlock_preempted_init(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch)
>> +{
>> + vcpu_arch->pv.base = GPA_INVALID;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool kvm_arm_is_pvlock_preempted_ready(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch)
>> +{
>> + return (vcpu_arch->pv.base != GPA_INVALID);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_update_pvlock_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 preempted);
>> +
>> void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome);
>>
>> struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> index 5ffbdc39e780..e4591f56d5f1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arm.o $(KVM)/arm/mmu.o $(KVM)/arm/mmio.
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/psci.o $(KVM)/arm/perf.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/hypercalls.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/pvtime.o
>> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/pvlock.o
>>
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += inject_fault.o regmap.o va_layout.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += hyp.o hyp-init.o handle_exit.o
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>> index 12e0280291ce..c562f62fdd45 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
>> @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> kvm_arm_pvtime_vcpu_init(&vcpu->arch);
>>
>> + kvm_arm_pvlock_preempted_init(&vcpu->arch);
>> +
>> return kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -421,6 +423,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
>> vcpu_set_wfx_traps(vcpu);
>>
>> vcpu_ptrauth_setup_lazy(vcpu);
>> +
>> + if (kvm_arm_is_pvlock_preempted_ready(&vcpu->arch))
>> + kvm_update_pvlock_preempted(vcpu, 0);
>> }
>>
>> void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> @@ -434,6 +439,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu->cpu = -1;
>>
>> kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(NULL);
>> +
>> + if (kvm_arm_is_pvlock_preempted_ready(&vcpu->arch))
>> + kvm_update_pvlock_preempted(vcpu, 1);
>> }
>>
>> static void vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
>> index ff13871fd85a..5964982ccd05 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> if (gpa != GPA_INVALID)
>> val = gpa;
>> break;
>> + case ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED:
>> + vcpu->arch.pv.base = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
>> + val = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
>
> It would be useful to at least do some basic validation that the address
> passed in is valid. Debugging problems with this interface will be hard
> if it always returns success even if the address cannot be used.
>
> The second patch also states that the structure should be 64 byte
> aligned, but there's nothing here to enforce that.
Thanks for posting this. I'll update the code.
>
> Steve
>
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
>> }
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..c3464958b0f5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright(c) 2019 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
>> + * Author: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +
>> +#include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
>> +
>> +void kvm_update_pvlock_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 preempted)
>> +{
>> + u64 preempted_le;
>> + u64 base;
>> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> +
>> + base = vcpu->arch.pv.base;
>> + preempted_le = cpu_to_le64(preempted);
>> + kvm_put_guest(kvm, base, preempted_le, u64);
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
>>
>
> .
>
Thanks,
Zengruan
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
