Re: [PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019/12/24 上午4:21, Alistair Delva wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:12 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:56 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
00fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
  ? preempt_count_add+0x58/0xb0
  ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x36/0x70
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1a/0x40
  ? __wake_up+0x70/0x190
  virtnet_set_features+0x90/0xf0 [virtio_net]
  __netdev_update_features+0x271/0x980
  ? nlmsg_notify+0x5b/0xa0
  dev_disable_lro+0x2b/0x190
  ? inet_netconf_notify_devconf+0xe2/0x120
  devinet_sysctl_forward+0x176/0x1e0
  proc_sys_call_handler+0x1f0/0x250
  proc_sys_write+0xf/0x20
  __vfs_write+0x3e/0x190
  ? __sb_start_write+0x6d/0xd0
  vfs_write+0xd3/0x190
  ksys_write+0x68/0xd0
  __ia32_sys_write+0x14/0x20
  do_fast_syscall_32+0x86/0xe0
  entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x7c/0x8e

A similar crash will likely trigger when enabling XDP.

Reported-by: Alistair Delva <adelva@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 3f93522ffab2 ("virtio-net: switch off offloads on demand if possible on XDP set")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Lightly tested.

Alistair, could you please test and confirm that this resolves the
crash for you?
This patch doesn't work. The reason is that NETIF_F_LRO is also turned
on by TSO4/TSO6, which your patch didn't check for. So it ends up
going through the same path and crashing in the same way.

         if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
             virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
                 dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;

It sounds like this patch is fixing something slightly differently to
my patch fixed. virtnet_set_features() doesn't care about
GUEST_OFFLOADS, it only tests against NETIF_F_LRO. Even if "offloads"
is zero, it will call virtnet_set_guest_offloads(), which triggers the
crash.

Interesting. It's surprising that it is trying to configure a flag
that is not configurable, i.e., absent from dev->hw_features
after Michael's change.

So either we need to ensure NETIF_F_LRO is never set, or
LRO might be available, just not configurable. Indeed this was what I
observed in the past.
dev_disable_lro expects that NETIF_F_LRO is always configurable. Which
I guess is a reasonable assumption, just not necessarily the case in
virtio_net.

So I think we need both patches. Correctly mark the feature as fixed
by removing from dev->hw_features and also ignore the request from
dev_disable_lro, which does not check for this.
Something like this maybe:

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 4d7d5434cc5d..0556f42b0fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -2560,6 +2560,9 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
         u64 offloads;
         int err;

+       if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
+               return 0;
+
         if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
                 if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
                         return -EBUSY;
@@ -2971,6 +2974,15 @@ static int virtnet_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev)
         if (!virtnet_validate_features(vdev))
                 return -EINVAL;

+       /* VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS does not work without
+        * VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. However the virtio spec does not
+        * specify that VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends
+        * on VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ so devices can set the later but
+        * not the former.
+        */
+       if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
+               __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS);
+
         if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) {
                 int mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev,
                                          offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,


We check feature dependency and fail the probe in virtnet_validate_features().

Is it more straightforward to fail the probe there when CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS was set but CTRL_VQ wasn't?

Thanks

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux