On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 03:03:52PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 16:48:35 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c b/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c
> > index a4ebd2445eda..8e06e7407854 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/emu/nfeth.c
> > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int nfeth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void nfeth_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
> > +static void nfeth_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev, int txqueue)
>
> Given the recent vf ndo problems, I wonder if it's worth making the
> queue id unsigned from the start? Since it's coming from the stack
> there should be no range checking required, but also signed doesn't
> help anything so why not?
>
> > {
> > dev->stats.tx_errors++;
> > netif_wake_queue(dev);
You are right. I'll change this.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
