Re: [PATCH] virtio_console: allocate inbufs in add_port() only if it is needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2019 14:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> When we hot unplug a virtserialport and then try to hot plug again,
>> it fails:
>>
>> (qemu) chardev-add socket,id=serial0,path=/tmp/serial0,server,nowait
>> (qemu) device_add virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=2,\
>>                   chardev=serial0,id=serial0,name=serial0
>> (qemu) device_del serial0
>> (qemu) device_add virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=2,\
>>                   chardev=serial0,id=serial0,name=serial0
>> kernel error:
>>   virtio-ports vport2p2: Error allocating inbufs
>> qemu error:
>>   virtio-serial-bus: Guest failure in adding port 2 for device \
>>                      virtio-serial0.0
>>
>> This happens because buffers for the in_vq are allocated when the port is
>> added but are not released when the port is unplugged.
>>
>> They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4)
>>
>> To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers
>> in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like
>> a waste of memory.
>>
>> Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to only allocate the
>> buffers if the in_vq has available free slots.
>>
>> Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset")
>> Cc: mst@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> index 7270e7b69262..77105166fe01 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> @@ -1421,12 +1421,17 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
>>  	spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock);
>>  	init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
>>  
>> -	/* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
>> -	nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
>> -	if (!nr_added_bufs) {
>> -		dev_err(port->dev, "Error allocating inbufs\n");
>> -		err = -ENOMEM;
>> -		goto free_device;
>> +	/* if the in_vq has not already been filled (the port has already been
>> +	 * used and unplugged), fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can
>> +	 * send us data.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (port->in_vq->num_free != 0) {
>> +		nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
>> +		if (!nr_added_bufs) {
>> +			dev_err(port->dev, "Error allocating inbufs\n");
>> +			err = -ENOMEM;
>> +			goto free_device;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (is_rproc_serial(port->portdev->vdev))
> 
> Well fill_queue will just add slots as long as it can.
> So on a full queue it does nothing. How does this patch help?

Yes, but in this case it returns 0 and so add_port() fails and exits
with -ENOMEM and the device is freed. It's what this patch tries to avoid.

Thanks,
Laurent

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux