read_barrier_depends() usage in vhost.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

In an attempt to remove the remaining traces of [smp_]read_barrier_depends()
following my previous patches to strengthen READ_ONCE() for Alpha [1], I
ended up trying to decipher the read_barrier_depends() usage in the vhost
driver:

--->8

// drivers/vhost/vhost.c
static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
			struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_size,
			unsigned int *out_num, unsigned int *in_num,
			struct vhost_log *log, unsigned int *log_num,
			struct vring_desc *indirect)
{
	[...]

	/* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
	 * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
	read_barrier_depends();

--->8

Unfortunately, although the barrier is commented (hurrah!), it's not
particularly enlightening about the accesses making up the dependency
chain, and I don't understand the supposed need for a compiler barrier
either (read_barrier_depends() doesn't generally provide this).

Does anybody know which accesses are being ordered here? Usually you'd need
a READ_ONCE()/rcu_dereference() beginning the chain, but I haven't managed
to find one...

Thanks,

Will

[1] c2bc66082e10 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()")
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux