On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:21:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2019/10/14 下午4:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE might have been useful for VMCI-specific
> > applications, but we should use SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF for portable
> > applications in the future. Those socket options also work with other
> > address families.
> >
I think hyperv_transport started to use it in this patch:
ac383f58f3c9 hv_sock: perf: Allow the socket buffer size options to influence
the actual socket buffers
> > I guess these sockopts are bypassed by AF_VSOCK because it doesn't use
> > the common skb queuing code in net/core/sock.c:(. But one day we might
> > migrate to it...
> >
> > Stefan
>
>
> +1, we should really consider to reuse the exist socket mechanism instead of
> re-inventing wheels.
+1, I totally agree. I'll go this way.
Guys, thank you all for your suggestions!
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
