[PATCH 4/4] drm/vram: Unconditonally set BO call-back functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The statement's condition is always true.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
index 73e81e3a8724..13717ae65da5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
@@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_init(struct drm_device *dev,
 	int ret;
 	size_t acc_size;
 
-	if (!gbo->bo.base.funcs)
-		gbo->bo.base.funcs = &drm_gem_vram_object_funcs;
+	gbo->bo.base.funcs = &drm_gem_vram_object_funcs;
 
 	ret = drm_gem_object_init(dev, &gbo->bo.base, size);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux