> On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:13 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 21.08.19 18:34, Nadav Amit wrote: >>> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:29 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 21.08.19 18:23, Nadav Amit wrote: >>>>> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:05 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 20.08.19 11:16, Nadav Amit wrote: >>>>>> There is no reason to print warnings when balloon page allocation fails, >>>>>> as they are expected and can be handled gracefully. Since VMware >>>>>> balloon now uses balloon-compaction infrastructure, and suppressed these >>>>>> warnings before, it is also beneficial to suppress these warnings to >>>>>> keep the same behavior that the balloon had before. >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure if that's a good idea. The allocation warnings are usually >>>>> the only trace of "the user/admin did something bad because he/she tried >>>>> to inflate the balloon to an unsafe value". Believe me, I processed a >>>>> couple of such bugreports related to virtio-balloon and the warning were >>>>> very helpful for that. >>>> >>>> Ok, so a message is needed, but does it have to be a generic frightening >>>> warning? >>>> >>>> How about using __GFP_NOWARN, and if allocation do something like: >>>> >>>> pr_warn(“Balloon memory allocation failed”); >>>> >>>> Or even something more informative? This would surely be less intimidating >>>> for common users. >>> >>> ratelimit would make sense :) >>> >>> And yes, this would certainly be nicer. >> >> Thanks. I will post v2 of the patch. > > As discussed in v2, we already print a warning in virtio-balloon, so I > am fine with this patch. > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Michael, If it is possible to get it to 5.3, to avoid behavioral change for VMware balloon users, it would be great. Thanks, Nadav _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
