On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:19:29PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 02:01:35PM +0300, Adalbert Lazăr wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 09:24:44 -0700, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:00:26PM +0300, Adalbert Lazăr wrote: > > > > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h > > > > @@ -417,8 +417,10 @@ PAGEFLAG(Idle, idle, PF_ANY) > > > > */ > > > > #define PAGE_MAPPING_ANON 0x1 > > > > #define PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 0x2 > > > > +#define PAGE_MAPPING_REMOTE 0x4 > > > > > > Uh. How do you know page->mapping would otherwise have bit 2 clear? > > > Who's guaranteeing that? > > > > > > This is an awfully big patch to the memory management code, buried in > > > the middle of a gigantic series which almost guarantees nobody would > > > look at it. I call shenanigans. > > > > > > > @@ -1021,7 +1022,7 @@ void page_move_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > > > * __page_set_anon_rmap - set up new anonymous rmap > > > > * @page: Page or Hugepage to add to rmap > > > > * @vma: VM area to add page to. > > > > - * @address: User virtual address of the mapping > > > > + * @address: User virtual address of the mapping > > > > > > And mixing in fluff changes like this is a real no-no. Try again. > > > > > > > No bad intentions, just overzealous. > > I didn't want to hide anything from our patches. > > Once we advance with the introspection patches related to KVM we'll be > > back with the remote mapping patch, split and cleaned. > > They are not bit left in struct page ! Looking at the patch it seems > you want to have your own pin count just for KVM. This is bad, we are > already trying to solve the GUP thing (see all various patchset about > GUP posted recently). > > You need to rethink how you want to achieve this. Why not simply a > remote read()/write() into the process memory ie KVMI would call > an ioctl that allow to read or write into a remote process memory > like ptrace() but on steroid ... > > Adding this whole big complex infrastructure without justification > of why we need to avoid round trip is just too much really. Thinking a bit more about this, you can achieve the same thing without adding a single line to any mm code. Instead of having mmap with PROT_NONE | MAP_LOCKED you have userspace mmap some kvm device file (i am assuming this is something you already have and can control the mmap callback). So now kernel side you have a vma with a vm_operations_struct under your control this means that everything you want to block mm wise from within the inspector process can be block through those call- backs (find_special_page() specificaly for which you have to return NULL all the time). To mirror target process memory you can use hmm_mirror, when you populate the inspector process page table you use insert_pfn() (mmap of the kvm device file must mark this vma as PFNMAP). By following the hmm_mirror API, anytime the target process has a change in its page table (ie virtual address -> page) you will get a callback and all you have to do is clear the page table within the inspector process and flush tlb (use zap_page_range). On page fault within the inspector process the fault callback of vm_ops will get call and from there you call hmm_mirror following its API. Oh also mark the vma with VM_WIPEONFORK to avoid any issue if the inspector process use fork() (you could support fork but then you would need to mark the vma as SHARED and use unmap_mapping_pages instead of zap_page_range). There everything you want to do with already upstream mm code. Cheers, Jérôme _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
