Re: [RFC PATCH v6 79/92] kvm: x86: emulate movsd xmm, m64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/08/19 18:00, Adalbert Lazăr wrote:
> From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is needed in order to be able to support guest code that uses movsd to
> write into pages that are marked for write tracking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 34431cf31f74..9d38f892beea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -1177,6 +1177,27 @@ static int em_fnstsw(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>  }
>  
> +static u8 simd_prefix_to_bytes(const struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> +			       int simd_prefix)
> +{
> +	u8 bytes;
> +
> +	switch (ctxt->b) {
> +	case 0x11:
> +		/* movsd xmm, m64 */
> +		/* movups xmm, m128 */
> +		if (simd_prefix == 0xf2) {
> +			bytes = 8;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		/* fallthrough */
> +	default:
> +		bytes = 16;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	return bytes;
> +}
> +
>  static void decode_register_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  				    struct operand *op)
>  {
> @@ -1187,7 +1208,7 @@ static void decode_register_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  
>  	if (ctxt->d & Sse) {
>  		op->type = OP_XMM;
> -		op->bytes = 16;
> +		op->bytes = ctxt->op_bytes;
>  		op->addr.xmm = reg;
>  		read_sse_reg(ctxt, &op->vec_val, reg);
>  		return;
> @@ -1238,7 +1259,7 @@ static int decode_modrm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  				ctxt->d & ByteOp);
>  		if (ctxt->d & Sse) {
>  			op->type = OP_XMM;
> -			op->bytes = 16;
> +			op->bytes = ctxt->op_bytes;
>  			op->addr.xmm = ctxt->modrm_rm;
>  			read_sse_reg(ctxt, &op->vec_val, ctxt->modrm_rm);
>  			return rc;
> @@ -4529,7 +4550,7 @@ static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_2b = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_10_0f_11 = {
> -	I(Unaligned, em_mov), I(Unaligned, em_mov), N, N,
> +	I(Unaligned, em_mov), I(Unaligned, em_mov), I(Unaligned, em_mov), N,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_28_0f_29 = {
> @@ -5097,7 +5118,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
>  {
>  	int rc = X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>  	int mode = ctxt->mode;
> -	int def_op_bytes, def_ad_bytes, goffset, simd_prefix;
> +	int def_op_bytes, def_ad_bytes, goffset, simd_prefix = 0;
>  	bool op_prefix = false;
>  	bool has_seg_override = false;
>  	struct opcode opcode;
> @@ -5320,7 +5341,8 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
>  			ctxt->op_bytes = 4;
>  
>  		if (ctxt->d & Sse)
> -			ctxt->op_bytes = 16;
> +			ctxt->op_bytes = simd_prefix_to_bytes(ctxt,
> +							      simd_prefix);
>  		else if (ctxt->d & Mmx)
>  			ctxt->op_bytes = 8;
>  	}
> 

Please submit all these emulator patches as a separate series, complete
with testcases for kvm-unit-tests.

Paolo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux