Hi Christoph, Michael,
On 7/25/19 3:04 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:53:49PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
>> I am confused: if vring_use_dma_api() returns false if the dma_mask is
>> unset (ie. vring_use_dma_api() returns false), the virtio-blk-pci device
>> will not be able to get translated addresses and won't work properly.
>>
>> The patch above allows the dma api to be used and only influences the
>> max_segment_size and it works properly.
>>
>> So is it normal the dma_mask is unset in my case?
>
> Its not normal. I assume you use virtio-nmio? Due to the mess with
> the dma_mask being a pointer a lot of subsystems forgot to set a dma
> mask up, and oddly enough seem to mostly get away with it.
>
No the issue is encountered with virtio-blk-pci
I think the problem is virtio_max_dma_size() is called from
virtblk_probe (virtio_blk.c) on the virtio<n> device and not the actual
virtio_pci_device which has a dma_mask set. I don't think the virtio<n>
device ever has a dma_mask set.
We do not hit the guest crash on the virtio-net-pci device as the
virtio-net driver does not call virtio_max_dma_size() on the virtio<n>
device.
Does fd1068e1860e ("virtio-blk: Consider virtio_max_dma_size() for
maximum segment size") call virtio_max_dma_size() on the right device?
Thanks
Eric
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
