Re: [PATCH 5/6] vhost: mark dirty pages during map uninit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019/7/23 下午5:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:57:17AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
We don't mark dirty pages if the map was teared down outside MMU
notifier. This will lead untracked dirty pages. Fixing by marking
dirty pages during map uninit.

Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 89c9f08b5146..5b8821d00fe4 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -306,6 +306,18 @@ static void vhost_map_unprefetch(struct vhost_map *map)
  	kfree(map);
  }
+static void vhost_set_map_dirty(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
+				struct vhost_map *map, int index)
+{
+	struct vhost_uaddr *uaddr = &vq->uaddrs[index];
+	int i;
+
+	if (uaddr->write) {
+		for (i = 0; i < map->npages; i++)
+			set_page_dirty(map->pages[i]);
+	}
+}
+
  static void vhost_uninit_vq_maps(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
  {
  	struct vhost_map *map[VHOST_NUM_ADDRS];
@@ -315,8 +327,10 @@ static void vhost_uninit_vq_maps(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
  	for (i = 0; i < VHOST_NUM_ADDRS; i++) {
  		map[i] = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->maps[i],
  				  lockdep_is_held(&vq->mmu_lock));
-		if (map[i])
+		if (map[i]) {
+			vhost_set_map_dirty(vq, map[i], i);
  			rcu_assign_pointer(vq->maps[i], NULL);
+		}
  	}
  	spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock);
@@ -354,7 +368,6 @@ static void vhost_invalidate_vq_start(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
  {
  	struct vhost_uaddr *uaddr = &vq->uaddrs[index];
  	struct vhost_map *map;
-	int i;
if (!vhost_map_range_overlap(uaddr, start, end))
  		return;
@@ -365,10 +378,7 @@ static void vhost_invalidate_vq_start(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
  	map = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->maps[index],
  					lockdep_is_held(&vq->mmu_lock));
  	if (map) {
-		if (uaddr->write) {
-			for (i = 0; i < map->npages; i++)
-				set_page_dirty(map->pages[i]);
-		}
+		vhost_set_map_dirty(vq, map, index);
  		rcu_assign_pointer(vq->maps[index], NULL);
  	}
  	spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock);
OK and the reason it's safe is because the invalidate counter
got incremented so we know page will not get mapped again.

But we*do*  need to wait for page not to be mapped.
And if that means waiting for VQ processing to finish,
then I worry that is a very log time.


I'm not sure I get you here. If we don't have such map, we will fall back to normal uaccess helper. And in the memory accessor, the rcu critical section is pretty small.

Thanks



_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux