Em Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:34:15 +0200 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> escreveu: > Le 30/05/2019 à 01:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a écrit : > > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +- > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6 +++--- > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 16 ++++++++-------- > > Documentation/admin-guide/ras.rst | 2 +- > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt | 7 +++---- > > .../bindings/pci/amlogic,meson-pcie.txt | 2 +- > > .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.txt | 2 +- > > Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt | 2 +- > > Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst | 2 +- > > .../firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst | 2 +- > > .../firmware-guide/acpi/method-tracing.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices | 2 +- > > Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt | 4 ++-- > > .../translations/it_IT/process/howto.rst | 2 +- > > .../it_IT/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 4 ++-- > > .../translations/zh_CN/process/4.Coding.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst | 2 +- > > Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.rst | 4 ++-- > > .../x86/x86_64/fake-numa-for-cpusets.rst | 2 +- > > MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +- > > arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 2 +- > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +- > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++-------- > > arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 2 +- > > arch/x86/boot/header.S | 2 +- > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +- > > arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h | 2 +- > > arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 2 +- > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h | 2 +- > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/platform/pvh/enlighten.c | 2 +- > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 10 +++++----- > > drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 2 +- > > .../fieldbus/Documentation/fieldbus_dev.txt | 4 ++-- > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +- > > include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fs_context.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 2 +- > > mm/Kconfig | 2 +- > > security/Kconfig | 2 +- > > tools/include/linux/err.h | 2 +- > > tools/objtool/Documentation/stack-validation.txt | 4 ++-- > > tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 2 +- > > 48 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) > > [...] > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > index 8c1c636308c8..e868d2bd48b8 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > @@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ config PPC_MEM_KEYS > > page-based protections, but without requiring modification of the > > page tables when an application changes protection domains. > > > > - For details, see Documentation/vm/protection-keys.rst > > + For details, see Documentation/x86/protection-keys.rst > > It looks strange to reference an x86 file, for powerpc arch. Indeed. Yet, seeking for the API documented there: $ git grep -l pkey_mprotect Documentation/x86/protection-keys.rst arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl include/linux/syscalls.h include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h kernel/sys_ni.c mm/mprotect.c tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl tools/perf/builtin-trace.c tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c Despite being used on several archs, the only documentation for it is inside the x86 directory, as it seems that this is not arch-specific. Perhaps the file should, instead, be moved to another book. Thanks, Mauro _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
