On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:57:30 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:09:02 +0200 > Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> @@ -224,6 +226,8 @@ struct subchannel *css_alloc_subchannel(struct subchannel_id schid, > > >> INIT_WORK(&sch->todo_work, css_sch_todo); > > >> sch->dev.release = &css_subchannel_release; > > >> device_initialize(&sch->dev); > > > > > > It might be helpful to add a comment why you use 31 bit here... > > > > @Halil, please let me know what comment you prefere here... > > > > How about? > > /* > * The physical addresses of some the dma structures that > * can belong to a subchannel need to fit 31 bit width (examples ccw,). > */ "e.g. ccw"? > > > > > > > >> + sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31); > > >> + sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask; > > >> return sch; > > >> > > >> err: > > >> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr) > > >> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr); > > >> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups; > > >> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release; > > > > > > ...and 64 bit here. > > > > and here. > > /* > * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device > * as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit > * addresses. > */ Thanks, that makes things hopefully clearer if we look at it some time in the future ;) _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
