On Tue, 28 May 2019 16:33:42 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2019 14:00:18 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 May 2019 18:22:09 +0200
> > Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Hypervisor needs to interact with the summary indicators, so these
> > > need to be DMA memory as well (at least for protected virtualization
> > > guests).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > (...)
> >
> > > @@ -1501,6 +1508,7 @@ static int __init virtio_ccw_init(void)
> > > {
> > > /* parse no_auto string before we do anything further */
> > > no_auto_parse();
> > > + summary_indicators = cio_dma_zalloc(MAX_AIRQ_AREAS);
> >
> > What happens if this fails?
>
> Bad things could happen!
>
> How about adding
>
> if (!summary_indicators)
> virtio_ccw_use_airq = 0; /* fall back to classic */
>
> ?
>
> Since it ain't very likely to happen, we could also just fail
> virtio_ccw_init() with -ENOMEM.
How high are the chances of things working if we fail to allocate here?
Returning with -ENOMEM is probably the more reasonable approach here.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
