Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:21:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 27/05/19 11:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void __init kvm_apf_trap_init(voi
> >  
> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, __pv_tlb_mask);
> >  
> > -static void kvm_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> > +static void kvm_flush_tlb_multi(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> >  			const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
> >  {
> >  	u8 state;
> > @@ -594,6 +594,9 @@ static void kvm_flush_tlb_others(const s
> >  	 * queue flush_on_enter for pre-empted vCPUs
> >  	 */
> >  	for_each_cpu(cpu, flushmask) {
> > +		if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
> > +			continue;
> > +
> 
> Even this would be just an optimization; the vCPU you're running on
> cannot be preempted.  You can just change others to multi.

Yeah, I know, but it felt weird so I added the explicit skip. No strong
feelings though.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux