Hi, > I think would be good to have a lockdep_assert_held here for the ww_mutex. > > Also general thing: _reserved is kinda ttm lingo, for dma-buf reservations > we call the structure tracking the fences+lock the "reservation", but the > naming scheme used is _lock/_unlock. > > I think would be good to be consistent with that, and use _locked here. > Especially for a very simplified vram helper like this one I expect that's > going to lead to less wtf moments by driver writers :-) > > Maybe we should also do a large-scale s/reserve/lock/ within ttm, to align > more with what we now have in dma-buf. Given that mgag200 is the only user I think the best way forward is to improve the mgag200 cursor handling so we can just drop the _reserved variants ... When looking at mga_crtc_cursor_set() I suspect the easierst way to do that would be to simply pin the cursor bo's at driver_load time, then we don't have to bother with pinning in mga_crtc_cursor_set() at all. Thomas, as you have test hardware, can you look into this? thanks, Gerd _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
