On 13.05.19 11:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2019 12:47:39 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 04:07:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2019 15:58:12 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05.05.19 13:15, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2019 16:03:40 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2019 16:04:48 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 11:17:24AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:36 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The commit 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add improved queue allocation API")
establishes a new way of allocating virtqueues (as a part of the effort
that taught DMA to virtio rings).
In the future we will want virtio-ccw to use the DMA API as well.
Let us switch from the legacy method of allocating virtqueues to
vring_create_virtqueue() as the first step into that direction.
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'd vote for merging this patch right away for 5.2.
So which tree is this going through? mine?
Christian, what do you think? If the whole series is supposed to go in
in one go (which I hope it is), via Martin's tree could be the simplest
route IMHO.
The first three patches are virtio(-ccw) only and the those are the ones
that I think are ready to go.
I'm not feeling comfortable going forward with the remainder as it
stands now; waiting for some other folks to give feedback. (They are
touching/interacting with code parts I'm not so familiar with, and lack
of documentation, while not the developers' fault, does not make it
easier.)
Michael, would you like to pick up 1-3 for your tree directly? That
looks like the easiest way.
Agreed. Michael please pick 1-3.
We will continue to review 4- first and then see which tree is best.
Michael, please let me know if you'll pick directly or whether I should
post a series.
[Given that the patches are from one virtio-ccw maintainer and reviewed
by the other, picking directly would eliminate an unnecessary
indirection :)]
picked them
Thanks!
Connie,
if I get you right here, you don't need a v2 for the
patches 1 through 3?
Thanks,
Michael
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
