Re: [PATCH 04/10] s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:39 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O
> buffers.  That requires some plumbing.
> 
> Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops
> correctly is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting
> I/O to a non-shared page would bring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/s390/Kconfig                   |  4 +++
>  arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 18 +++++++++++++
>  arch/s390/mm/init.c                 | 50
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 72
> insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index 1c3fcf19c3af..5500d05d4d53 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +config ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
> +        def_bool y
> +
>  config MMU
>  	def_bool y
>  
> @@ -191,6 +194,7 @@ config S390
>  	select ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME
>  	select VIRT_TO_BUS
>  	select HAVE_NMI
> +	select SWIOTLB
>  
>  
>  config SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0898c09a888c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +#define S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#define sme_me_mask	0ULL

This is rather ugly, but I understand why it's there

> +
> +static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
> +extern bool sev_active(void);
> +
> +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> +int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
> +
> +#endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif	/* S390_MEM_ENCRYPT_H__ */
> +
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> index 3e82f66d5c61..7e3cbd15dcfa 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mman.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/swap.h>
> +#include <linux/swiotlb.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/cma.h>
>  #include <linux/gfp.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> @@ -42,6 +44,8 @@
>  #include <asm/sclp.h>
>  #include <asm/set_memory.h>
>  #include <asm/kasan.h>
> +#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <asm/uv.h>
>  
>  pgd_t swapper_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD] __section(.bss..swapper_pg_dir);
>  
> @@ -126,6 +130,50 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  	pr_info("Write protected read-only-after-init data: %luk\n",
> size >> 10); }
>  
> +int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* make all pages shared, (swiotlb, dma_free) */

this is a copypaste typo, I think? (should be UNshared?)
also, it doesn't make ALL pages unshared, but only those specified in
the parameters

with this fixed:
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +	for (i = 0; i < numpages; ++i) {
> +		uv_remove_shared(addr);
> +		addr += PAGE_SIZE;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_encrypted);
> +
> +int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	/* make all pages shared (swiotlb, dma_alloca) */

same here with ALL

> +	for (i = 0; i < numpages; ++i) {
> +		uv_set_shared(addr);
> +		addr += PAGE_SIZE;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_memory_decrypted);
> +
> +/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
> +bool sev_active(void)

this is also ugly. the correct solution would be probably to refactor
everything, including all the AMD SEV code.... let's not go there

> +{
> +	return is_prot_virt_guest();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sev_active);
> +
> +/* protected virtualization */
> +static void pv_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (!sev_active())

can't you just use is_prot_virt_guest here?

> +		return;
> +
> +	/* make sure bounce buffers are shared */
> +	swiotlb_init(1);
> +	swiotlb_update_mem_attributes();
> +	swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_FORCE;
> +}
> +
>  void __init mem_init(void)
>  {
>  	cpumask_set_cpu(0, &init_mm.context.cpu_attach_mask);
> @@ -134,6 +182,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>  	set_max_mapnr(max_low_pfn);
>          high_memory = (void *) __va(max_low_pfn * PAGE_SIZE);
>  
> +	pv_init();
> +
>  	/* Setup guest page hinting */
>  	cmma_init();
>  

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux