Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] vsock/virtio: increase RX buffer size to 64 KiB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019/5/10 下午8:58, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
In order to increase host -> guest throughput with large packets,
we can use 64 KiB RX buffers.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
index 84b72026d327..5a9d25be72df 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
  #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_MIN_BUF_SIZE	128
  #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE		(1024 * 256)
  #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_MAX_BUF_SIZE	(1024 * 256)
-#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE	(1024 * 4)
+#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE	(1024 * 64)
  #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_BUF_SIZE		0xFFFFFFFFUL
  #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE		(1024 * 64)


We probably don't want such high order allocation. It's better to switch to use order 0 pages in this case. See add_recvbuf_big() for virtio-net. If we get datapath unified, we will get more stuffs set.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux