Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019/4/4 下午6:58, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
changes:
  - patch 1/4: reduces the number of credit update messages sent to the
               transmitter
  - patch 2/4: allows the host to split packets on multiple buffers,
               in this way, we can remove the packet size limit to
               VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE
  - patch 3/4: uses VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE as the max packet size
               allowed
  - patch 4/4: increases RX buffer size to 64 KiB (affects only host->guest)

RFC:
  - maybe patch 4 can be replaced with multiple queues with different
    buffer sizes or using EWMA to adapt the buffer size to the traffic


Or EWMA + mergeable rx buffer, but if we decide to unify the datapath with virtio-net, we can reuse their codes.



  - as Jason suggested in a previous thread [1] I'll evaluate to use
    virtio-net as transport, but I need to understand better how to
    interface with it, maybe introducing sk_buff in virtio-vsock.

Any suggestions?


My understanding is this is not a must, but if it makes things easier, we can do this.

Another thing that may help is to implement sendpage(), which will greatly improve the performance.

Thanks



Here some benchmarks step by step. I used iperf3 [2] modified with VSOCK
support:

                         host -> guest [Gbps]
pkt_size    before opt.   patch 1   patches 2+3   patch 4
   64            0.060       0.102       0.102       0.096
   256           0.22        0.40        0.40        0.36
   512           0.42        0.82        0.85        0.74
   1K            0.7         1.6         1.6         1.5
   2K            1.5         3.0         3.1         2.9
   4K            2.5         5.2         5.3         5.3
   8K            3.9         8.4         8.6         8.8
   16K           6.6        11.1        11.3        12.8
   32K           9.9        15.8        15.8        18.1
   64K          13.5        17.4        17.7        21.4
   128K         17.9        19.0        19.0        23.6
   256K         18.0        19.4        19.8        24.4
   512K         18.4        19.6        20.1        25.3

                         guest -> host [Gbps]
pkt_size    before opt.   patch 1   patches 2+3
   64            0.088       0.100       0.101
   256           0.35        0.36        0.41
   512           0.70        0.74        0.73
   1K            1.1         1.3         1.3
   2K            2.4         2.4         2.6
   4K            4.3         4.3         4.5
   8K            7.3         7.4         7.6
   16K           9.2         9.6        11.1
   32K           8.3         8.9        18.1
   64K           8.3         8.9        25.4
   128K          7.2         8.7        26.7
   256K          7.7         8.4        24.9
   512K          7.7         8.5        25.0

Thanks,
Stefano

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg531783.html
[2] https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/iperf/

Stefano Garzarella (4):
   vsock/virtio: reduce credit update messages
   vhost/vsock: split packets to send using multiple buffers
   vsock/virtio: change the maximum packet size allowed
   vsock/virtio: increase RX buffer size to 64 KiB

  drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
  include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |  3 ++-
  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 18 +++++++++----
  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux