Re: virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:53:33PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2019/3/19 上午10:22, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> > 
> > On 3/18/19 3:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2019/3/15 下午8:41, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:50:11 +0800
> > > > Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > option 3:
> > We should allow more vectors even the block layer would support at most
> > nr_cpu_ids queues.
> > 
> > 
> > I understand a new policy for queue-vector mapping is very helpful. I am just
> > asking the question from block layer's point of view.
> > 
> > Thank you very much!
> > 
> > Dongli Zhang
> 
> 
> Don't know much for block, cc Stefan for more idea.

Thanks for CCing me.  I don't have much input at this stage.

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux