Re: [PATCH net v2] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave interfaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/19/2019 10:20 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
Hi Sridhar,

Are you fine with leaving the IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK flag as is, and thus can provide your Ack-by or Reviewed-by? I can change the code if you feel strong.

My preference would be not to introduce a new flag unless there is any usecase where we want a IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE type of device to support 2 different behaviors. (rename_ok and rename_not_ok)

Thanks
Sridhar


Thanks,
-Siwei


On 3/6/2019 8:54 PM, si-wei liu wrote:


On 3/6/2019 8:13 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:

On 3/6/2019 7:08 PM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover
master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened
right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace
(udev) may fail to rename the slave if the kernel (net_failover)
opens the slave earlier than when the userspace rename happens.
Unlike bond or team, the primary slave of failover can't be renamed by
userspace ahead of time, since the kernel initiated auto-enslavement is
unable to, or rather, is never meant to be synchronized with the rename
request from userspace.

As the failover slave interfaces are not designed to be operated
directly by userspace apps: IP configuration, filter rules with
regard to network traffic passing and etc., should all be done on master
interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the
name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long
as admin users can see reliable names that may carry
other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that
"ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a
name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to.

Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because
there might be admin script or management software that is already
relying on such behavior and assumes that the slave name can't be
changed once UP. But failover is special: with the in-kernel
auto-enslavement mechanism, the userspace expectation for device
enumeration and bring-up order is already broken. Previously initramfs
and various userspace config tools were modified to bypass failover
slaves because of auto-enslavement and duplicate MAC address. Similarly,
in case that users care about seeing reliable slave name, the new type
of failover slaves needs to be taken care of specifically in userspace
anyway.

It's less risky to lift up the rename restriction on failover slave
which is already UP. Although it's possible this change may potentially
break userspace component (most likely configuration scripts or
management software) that assumes slave name can't be changed while
UP, it's relatively a limited and controllable set among all userspace
components, which can be fixed specifically to work with the new naming
behavior of failover slaves. Userspace component interacting with
slaves should be changed to operate on failover master instead, as the
failover slave is dynamic in nature which may come and go at any point.
The goal is to make the role of failover slaves less relevant, and
all userspace should only deal with master in the long run.

Fixes: 30c8bd5aa8b2 ("net: Introduce generic failover module")
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
v1 -> v2:
- Drop configurable module parameter (Sridhar)


  include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +++
  net/core/dev.c            | 3 ++-
  net/core/failover.c       | 6 +++---
  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 857f8ab..6d9e4e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1487,6 +1487,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
   * @IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER: device doesn't support the rx_handler hook
   * @IFF_FAILOVER: device is a failover master device
   * @IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE: device is lower dev of a failover master device + * @IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK: rename is allowed while slave device is running
   */
  enum netdev_priv_flags {
      IFF_802_1Q_VLAN            = 1<<0,
@@ -1518,6 +1519,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
      IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER        = 1<<26,
      IFF_FAILOVER            = 1<<27,
      IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE        = 1<<28,
+    IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK        = 1<<29,
  };
    #define IFF_802_1Q_VLAN            IFF_802_1Q_VLAN
@@ -1548,6 +1550,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
  #define IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER        IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER
  #define IFF_FAILOVER            IFF_FAILOVER
  #define IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE        IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE
+#define IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK        IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK
    /**
   *    struct net_device - The DEVICE structure.
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 722d50d..ae070de 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1180,7 +1180,8 @@ int dev_change_name(struct net_device *dev, const char *newname)
      BUG_ON(!dev_net(dev));
        net = dev_net(dev);
-    if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
+    if (dev->flags & IFF_UP &&
+        !(dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK))
          return -EBUSY;

Without the configurable module parameter, i think we don't even need
the new SLAVE_RENAME_OK private flag.
Can't we simply check for IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE ?
I'd prefer keeping this flag for now, even though without configurable module parameter. This has clear semantics that helps decouple behavior against specific link type, and may benefit other auto-enslaved netdevs as well.

-Siwei


write_seqcount_begin(&devnet_rename_seq);
diff --git a/net/core/failover.c b/net/core/failover.c
index 4a92a98..34c5c87 100644
--- a/net/core/failover.c
+++ b/net/core/failover.c
@@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static int failover_slave_register(struct net_device *slave_dev)
          goto err_upper_link;
      }
  -    slave_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
+    slave_dev->priv_flags |= (IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
        if (fops && fops->slave_register &&
          !fops->slave_register(slave_dev, failover_dev))
          return NOTIFY_OK;
        netdev_upper_dev_unlink(slave_dev, failover_dev);
-    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
+    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
  err_upper_link:
      netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
  done:
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int failover_slave_unregister(struct net_device *slave_dev)
        netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
      netdev_upper_dev_unlink(slave_dev, failover_dev);
-    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
+    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
        if (fops && fops->slave_unregister &&
          !fops->slave_unregister(slave_dev, failover_dev))



_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux