Re: [PATCH 01/26] drm/irq: Don't check for DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ in drm_irq_(un)install

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel.

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 05:58:06PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> If a non-legacy driver calls these it's valid to assume there is
> interrupt support. The flag is really only needed for legacy drivers.
> 
> Also remove all the flag usage from non-legacy drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-amlogic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The actual code changes looks good.
But if this is the right thing to do I cannot tell.

On this (limited) basis I provide an:
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux