On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:13 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Daniel et al. > > > > > > > Yeah the drm_crtc_helper.h header is a bit the miniature drmP.h for legacy > > > kms drivers. Just removing it from all the atomic drivers caused lots of > > > fallout, I expect even more if you entirely remove the includes it has. > > > Maybe a todo, care to pls create that patch since it's your idea? > > > > The main reason I bailed out initially was that this would create > > small changes to several otherwise seldomly touched files. > > And then we would later come and remove drmP.h - so lots of > > small but incremental changes to the same otherwise seldomly > > edited files. > > And the job was only partially done. > > > > I will try to experiment with an approach where I clean up the > > include/drm/*.h files a little (like suggested above, +delete drmP.h > > and maybe a bit more). > > > > Then to try on a driver by driver basis to make it build with a > > cleaned set of include files. > > I hope that the cleaned up driver can still build without the > > cleaned header files so the changes can be submitted piecemal. > > > > Will do so with an eye on the lesser maintained drivers to try it > > out to avoid creating too much chrunch for others. > > I have now a few patches queued, but the result is not too pretty. > I did the following: > > - For all files in include/drm/*.h the set of include files > were adjusted to the minimum number of files required to make > them build without any other files included first. > > Created one .c file for each .h file. Then included the .h > file and adjusted to the minimal set of include files. > In the process a lot of forwards were added. > > - Deleted drmP.h > > - Fixed build of a few drivers: sti, tilcdc, gma500, tve200, via > > Some observations: > > - Killing all the includes not needed in the headers files > results in a a lot of extra changes. > Examples: > drm_modseset_helper_vtables.h is no longer > included by anyone, so needs to be added in many files > > drm_atomic_state_helper.h is no longer included > by anyone so likewise needs to be added in many files > > - It is very tedious to do this properly. > The process I followed was: > - delete / comment out all include files > - add back the obvious from a quick scan of the code > - build - fix - build - fix - build - fix ... > - next file... > > - The result is errorprone as only the allyesconfig + allmodconfig > variants are tested. But reallife configurations are more diverse. > > Current diffstat: > 111 files changed, 771 insertions(+), 401 deletions(-) > > This is for the 5 drivers alone and not the header cleanup. > So long story short - this is not good and not the way forward. > > I will try to come up with a few improvements to make the > headers files selfcontained, but restricted to the changes that > add forwards/include to avoid the chrunch in all the drivers. > > And then post for review a few patches to clean up some headers. > If the cleanup gets a go I will try to persuade the introduction > of these. > This will include, but will not be limited to, the above mentioned > drm_crtc_helper.h header file. > > For now too much time was already spent on this, so it is at the > moment pushed back on my TODO list. > This mail serve also as a kind of "where had I left", when/if I > pick this up again. > > If there are anyone that knows some tooling that can help in the > process of adjusting the header files I am all ears. Yeah in the process of splitting up drmP.h we've created a few smaller such piles of headers. I think in some cases it's just not going to be worth it to fully split them up, e.g. drm_crtc_helper.h is going to be a pure legacy helper, only needed by pre-atomic drivers. Splitting that up doesn't seem to useful to me. Similarly we might want drm_atomic_helper.h to keep pulling in the other helper headers. So probably going to be a judgement call on a case-by-case basis. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
