Den 10.01.2019 11.16, skrev Gerd Hoffmann: > Hi, > >>> - drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked(&bochs->fb.helper, 1); >> >> The generic fbdev emulation doesn't take care of suspend/resume. You >> could do this: >> drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked(drm_dev->fb_helper, 1); > > Additional to drm_mode_config_helper_suspend() I assume? No, sorry for the confusion. I didn't know if you could use drm_mode_config_helper_suspend() or not. That function takes care of fbdev suspend as well: int drm_mode_config_helper_suspend(struct drm_device *dev) { <...> drm_kms_helper_poll_disable(dev); drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked(dev->fb_helper, 1); state = drm_atomic_helper_suspend(dev); <...> } > Does the call order matter? > >>> drm_helper_resume_force_mode(drm_dev); >> >> The docs for this function has this to say: >> * This function is deprecated. New drivers should implement atomic mode- >> * setting and use the atomic suspend/resume helpers. >> >> Maybe you can use drm_mode_config_helper_suspend/resume() instead like >> suggested in the drm_fbdev_generic_setup() docs. > > That should work, yes. The driver is simple enough ;) > > cheers, > Gerd > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization