[PATCH 2/2] virtio: document virtio_config_ops restrictions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some transports (e.g. virtio-ccw) implement virtio operations that
seem to be a simple read/write as something more involved that
cannot be done from an atomic context.

Give at least a hint about that.

Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/virtio_config.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index 7087ef946ba7..987b6491b946 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ struct irq_affinity;
 
 /**
  * virtio_config_ops - operations for configuring a virtio device
+ * Note: Do not assume that a transport implements all of the operations
+ *       getting/setting a value as a simple read/write! Generally speaking,
+ *       any of @get/@set, @get_status/@set_status, or @get_features/
+ *       @finalize_features are NOT safe to be called from an atomic
+ *       context.
  * @get: read the value of a configuration field
  *	vdev: the virtio_device
  *	offset: the offset of the configuration field
-- 
2.17.2

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux