* Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This series reverts the in-kernel workarounds for inlining issues. > > The commit description of 77b0bf55bc67 mentioned > "We also hope that GCC will eventually get fixed,..." > > Now, GCC provides a solution. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html > explains the new "asm inline" syntax. > > The performance issue will be eventually solved. > > [About Code cleanups] > > I know Nadam Amit is opposed to the full revert. > He also claims his motivation for macrofying was not only > performance, but also cleanups. > > IIUC, the criticism addresses the code duplication between C and ASM. > > If so, I'd like to suggest a different approach for cleanups. > Please see the last 3 patches. > IMHO, preprocessor approach is more straight-forward, and readable. > Basically, this idea should work because it is what we already do for > __ASM_FORM() etc. > > [Quick Test of "asm inline" of GCC 9] > > If you want to try "asm inline" feature, the patch is available: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1024590/ > > The number of symbols for arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig: > > nr_symbols > [1] v4.20-rc7 : 96502 > [2] [1]+full revert : 96705 (+203) > [3] [2]+"asm inline": 96568 (-137) > > [3]: apply my patch, then replace "asm" -> "asm_inline" > for _BUG_FLAGS(), refcount_add(), refcount_inc(), refcount_dec(), > annotate_reachable(), annotate_unreachable() > > > Changes in v3: > - Split into per-commit revert (per Nadav Amit) > - Add some cleanups with preprocessor approach > > Changes in v2: > - Revive clean-ups made by 5bdcd510c2ac (per Peter Zijlstra) > - Fix commit quoting style (per Peter Zijlstra) > > Masahiro Yamada (12): > Revert "x86/jump-labels: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around > GCC inlining bugs" > Revert "x86/cpufeature: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around > GCC inlining bugs" > Revert "x86/extable: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC > inlining bugs" > Revert "x86/paravirt: Work around GCC inlining bugs when compiling > paravirt ops" > Revert "x86/bug: Macrofy the BUG table section handling, to work > around GCC inlining bugs" > Revert "x86/alternatives: Macrofy lock prefixes to work around GCC > inlining bugs" > Revert "x86/refcount: Work around GCC inlining bug" > Revert "x86/objtool: Use asm macros to work around GCC inlining bugs" > Revert "kbuild/Makefile: Prepare for using macros in inline assembly > code to work around asm() related GCC inlining bugs" > linux/linkage: add ASM() macro to reduce duplication between C/ASM > code > x86/alternatives: consolidate LOCK_PREFIX macro > x86/asm: consolidate ASM_EXTABLE_* macros > > Makefile | 9 +-- > arch/x86/Makefile | 7 --- > arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-asm.h | 22 +------ > arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-common.h | 47 +++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h | 30 +--------- > arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h | 46 +++++---------- > arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h | 98 +++++++++++++------------------ > arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 82 +++++++++++--------------- > arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h | 22 +++++-- > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 56 +++++++++--------- > arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h | 81 +++++++++++-------------- > arch/x86/kernel/macros.S | 16 ----- > include/asm-generic/bug.h | 8 +-- > include/linux/compiler.h | 56 ++++-------------- > include/linux/linkage.h | 8 +++ > scripts/Kbuild.include | 4 +- > scripts/mod/Makefile | 2 - > 17 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 345 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/alternative-common.h > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/macros.S I absolutely agree that this needs to be resolved in v4.20. So I did the 1-9 reverts manually myself as well, because I think the first commit should be reverted fully to get as close to the starting point as possible (we are late in the cycle) - and came to the attached interdiff between your series and mine. Does this approach look OK to you, or did I miss something? Thanks, Ingo =============> entry/calling.h | 2 - include/asm/jump_label.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h index 25e5a6bda8c3..20d0885b00fb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h +++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with .macro CALL_enter_from_user_mode #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL - STATIC_BRANCH_JMP l_yes=.Lafter_call_\@, key=context_tracking_enabled, branch=1 + STATIC_JUMP_IF_FALSE .Lafter_call_\@, context_tracking_enabled, def=0 #endif call enter_from_user_mode .Lafter_call_\@: diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h index cf88ebf9a4ca..21efc9d07ed9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h @@ -2,6 +2,19 @@ #ifndef _ASM_X86_JUMP_LABEL_H #define _ASM_X86_JUMP_LABEL_H +#ifndef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL +/* + * For better or for worse, if jump labels (the gcc extension) are missing, + * then the entire static branch patching infrastructure is compiled out. + * If that happens, the code in here will malfunction. Raise a compiler + * error instead. + * + * In theory, jump labels and the static branch patching infrastructure + * could be decoupled to fix this. + */ +#error asm/jump_label.h included on a non-jump-label kernel +#endif + #define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 5 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 @@ -53,26 +66,37 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, bool #else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ -.macro STATIC_BRANCH_NOP l_yes:req key:req branch:req -.Lstatic_branch_nop_\@: - .byte STATIC_KEY_INIT_NOP -.Lstatic_branch_no_after_\@: +.macro STATIC_JUMP_IF_TRUE target, key, def +.Lstatic_jump_\@: + .if \def + /* Equivalent to "jmp.d32 \target" */ + .byte 0xe9 + .long \target - .Lstatic_jump_after_\@ +.Lstatic_jump_after_\@: + .else + .byte STATIC_KEY_INIT_NOP + .endif .pushsection __jump_table, "aw" _ASM_ALIGN - .long .Lstatic_branch_nop_\@ - ., \l_yes - . - _ASM_PTR \key + \branch - . + .long .Lstatic_jump_\@ - ., \target - . + _ASM_PTR \key - . .popsection .endm -.macro STATIC_BRANCH_JMP l_yes:req key:req branch:req -.Lstatic_branch_jmp_\@: - .byte 0xe9 - .long \l_yes - .Lstatic_branch_jmp_after_\@ -.Lstatic_branch_jmp_after_\@: +.macro STATIC_JUMP_IF_FALSE target, key, def +.Lstatic_jump_\@: + .if \def + .byte STATIC_KEY_INIT_NOP + .else + /* Equivalent to "jmp.d32 \target" */ + .byte 0xe9 + .long \target - .Lstatic_jump_after_\@ +.Lstatic_jump_after_\@: + .endif .pushsection __jump_table, "aw" _ASM_ALIGN - .long .Lstatic_branch_jmp_\@ - ., \l_yes - . - _ASM_PTR \key + \branch - . + .long .Lstatic_jump_\@ - ., \target - . + _ASM_PTR \key + 1 - . .popsection .endm _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
