On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:39:16AM +0800, gchen chen wrote: > Yes, I think so. > and i think the point is that unuse_mm() can't directly set tsk->mm=NULL. So why can't unuse_mm call mm_update_next_owner? -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
