On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 09:47:29PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:10:48PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:48:42PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > Switch to using the _SPLIT_ and _PACKED_ variants of vring flags
> > > in split ring and packed ring respectively.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > @@ -502,7 +505,8 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > > }
> > > }
> > > /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> > > - desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> > > + desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > > + (u16)~BIT(VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT));
> > >
> > > if (indirect) {
> > > /* Now that the indirect table is filled in, map it. */
> >
> > I kind of dislike it that this forces use of a cast here.
> > Kind of makes it more fragile. Let's use a temporary instead?
>
> I tried something like this:
>
> u16 mask = ~BIT(VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT);
>
> And it will still cause the warning:
>
> warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
> u16 mask = ~BIT(VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT);
>
> If the cast isn't wanted, maybe use ~(1 << VRING_SPLIT_DESC_F_NEXT)
> directly?
What I'd like to see is a macro that warns/errors out if the shift is
too large. I'll think it over on the weekend.
>
> >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
