On 12/08/2018 02:01 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:34:41PM +0800, Dongli Zhang wrote: >> VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG() is deprecated. Use VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF() instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 6 ++++-- >> include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h | 2 -- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c >> index de062fb..eff9ddc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c >> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c >> @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ static void vp_get(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned offset, >> { >> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); >> void __iomem *ioaddr = vp_dev->ioaddr + >> - VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(vp_dev) + offset; >> + VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(vp_dev->msix_enabled) + >> + offset; >> u8 *ptr = buf; >> int i; >> >> @@ -67,7 +68,8 @@ static void vp_set(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned offset, >> { >> struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); >> void __iomem *ioaddr = vp_dev->ioaddr + >> - VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(vp_dev) + offset; >> + VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(vp_dev->msix_enabled) + >> + offset; >> const u8 *ptr = buf; >> int i; >> > > I agree that VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF is a better interface. So above looks > fine. > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h >> index 90007a1..2070232 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h >> @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ >> /* The remaining space is defined by each driver as the per-driver >> * configuration space */ >> #define VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(msix_enabled) ((msix_enabled) ? 24 : 20) >> -/* Deprecated: please use VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF instead */ >> -#define VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(dev) VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF((dev)->msix_enabled) >> >> /* Virtio ABI version, this must match exactly */ >> #define VIRTIO_PCI_ABI_VERSION 0 > > This might break some userspace builds, I don't see why we should bother > removing it. Any reason? Apologies. I thought about some compatibility issue for building third-party kernel module at userspace, but did not realize it will break other userspace software builds. I will keep the definition of VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG() and resend again. Thank you very much! Dongli Zhang > > >> -- >> 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization