On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> it seems that it depends on current not on the active mm.
Yes, see my other suggestion to just fix "use_mm()" to update the address range.
Would you mind testing that?
Because that would seem to be the *much* less error-prone model..
Linus
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
