On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2018年09月23日 21:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This patches improve the guest receive performance. > >> On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue > >> at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. > >> > >> For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6 > >> > >> Tonghao Zhang (6): > >> net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one > >> net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation > >> net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll() > >> net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path > >> net: vhost: disable rx wakeup during tx busypoll > >> net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate > >> > >> drivers/vhost/net.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > >> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 +++----- > >> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 1.8.3.1 > >> > > ping ? > > HI Tonghao: > > As David pointed out, we only receive first 4 patches. You probably need > to resend the series. OK > Thanks _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization