Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/paravirt: move the Xen-only pv_irq_ops under the PARAVIRT_XXL umbrella

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/08/18 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:37:37AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Some of the paravirt ops defined in pv_irq_ops are for Xen PV guests
>> only. Define them only if CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL is set.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> index e652ec27d945..ae53ee36d8fb 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> @@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ struct pv_irq_ops {
>>  	struct paravirt_callee_save irq_disable;
>>  	struct paravirt_callee_save irq_enable;
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
>>  	void (*safe_halt)(void);
>>  	void (*halt)(void);
>> +#endif
> 
> that makes me sad... but it appears VSMP also uses them. Can't you
> simply make VSMP also select XXL, I don't think that's used quite as
> much as Xen is :-)
> 

Sure, why not?

Any objections?


Juergen
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux