Commands with protection information included were not truncating the
protection iov_iter to the number of protection bytes in the command.
This resulted in vhost_scsi mis-calculating the size of the protection
SGL in vhost_scsi_calc_sgls(), and including both the protection and
data SG entries in the protection SGL.
Fixes: 09b13fa8c1a1 ("vhost/scsi: Add ANY_LAYOUT support in vhost_scsi_handle_vq")
Signed-off-by: Greg Edwards <gedwards@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
index 76f8d649147b..cbe0ea26c1ff 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
@@ -964,7 +964,8 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
prot_bytes = vhost32_to_cpu(vq, v_req_pi.pi_bytesin);
}
/*
- * Set prot_iter to data_iter, and advance past any
+ * Set prot_iter to data_iter and truncate it to
+ * prot_bytes, and advance data_iter past any
* preceeding prot_bytes that may be present.
*
* Also fix up the exp_data_len to reflect only the
@@ -973,6 +974,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
if (prot_bytes) {
exp_data_len -= prot_bytes;
prot_iter = data_iter;
+ iov_iter_truncate(&prot_iter, prot_bytes);
iov_iter_advance(&data_iter, prot_bytes);
}
tag = vhost64_to_cpu(vq, v_req_pi.tag);
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
