Re: [PATCH net-next v8 7/7] net: vhost: make busyloop_intr more accurate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018年08月21日 08:33, Jason Wang wrote:


On 2018年08月19日 20:11, xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx>

The patch uses vhost_has_work_pending() to check if
the specified handler is scheduled, because in the most case,
vhost_has_work() return true when other side handler is added
to worker list. Use the vhost_has_work_pending() insead of
vhost_has_work().

Topology:
[Host] ->linux bridge -> tap vhost-net ->[Guest]

TCP_STREAM (netperf):
* Without the patch:  38035.39 Mbps, 3.37 us mean latency
* With the patch:     38409.44 Mbps, 3.34 us mean latency

The improvement is not obvious as last version. Do you imply there's some recent changes of vhost that make it faster?


I misunderstood the numbers, please ignore this.

It shows less than 1% improvement. I'm not sure it's worth to do so. Can you try bi-directional pktgen to see if it has more obvious effect?

Thanks

Thanks


Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/net.c | 9 ++++++---
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index db63ae2..b6939ef 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -487,10 +487,8 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
      endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
        while (vhost_can_busy_poll(endtime)) {
-        if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev)) {
-            *busyloop_intr = true;
+        if (vhost_has_work(&net->dev))
              break;
-        }
            if ((sock_has_rx_data(sock) &&
               !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, rvq)) ||
@@ -513,6 +511,11 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
          !vhost_has_work_pending(&net->dev, VHOST_NET_VQ_RX))
          vhost_net_enable_vq(net, rvq);
  +    if (vhost_has_work_pending(&net->dev,
+                   poll_rx ?
+                   VHOST_NET_VQ_RX: VHOST_NET_VQ_TX))
+        *busyloop_intr = true;
+
      mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
  }

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux