On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:39:24AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:35:07PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-07-06 at 11:12 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > cirrus can handle 1024x768 (and slightly higher) with 24bpp depth. > > > cirrus can handle up to 800x600 with 32bpp. > > > > 16bpp is maybe a better choice? Nobody's using cirrus because they care > > about color fidelity and it'll use less CPU to update. There's > > precedent here, mgag200 defaults to 16bpp on sufficiently memory- > > impaired devices. > > Yeah nouveau does the same fallback to 16bpp if there's not enough vram. > So do a bunch of other drivers. Makes sense. But appearently 16bpp support bitrotted over time, when just flipping the default the driver Oopses at init time. I'll look into it. cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
