On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:56 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2018年07月04日 12:31, xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This patches improve the guest receive and transmit performance. > > On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time. > > handle_rx do that in the same way. > > > > For more performance report, see patch 4. > > > > v4 -> v5: > > fix some issues > > > > v3 -> v4: > > fix some issues > > > > v2 -> v3: > > This patches are splited from previous big patch: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/934673/ > > > > Tonghao Zhang (4): > > vhost: lock the vqs one by one > > net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation > > net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll() > > net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path > > > > drivers/vhost/net.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 ++++------- > > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > > > Hi, any progress on the new version? > > I plan to send a new series of packed virtqueue support of vhost. If you > plan to send it soon, I can wait. Otherwise, I will send my series. I rebase the codes. and find there is no improvement anymore, the patches of makita may solve the problem. jason you may send your patches, and I will do some research on busypoll. > Thanks _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
