Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018年07月04日 17:46, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:18 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 2018年07月04日 15:59, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
On 2018/07/04 13:31, xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
...
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
+                            struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
+                            struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
+                            bool rx)
+{
+    unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
+    unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
+    struct socket *sock;
+    struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = rx ? tvq : rvq;
+
+    mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
+
+    vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+    sock = rvq->private_data;
+    busyloop_timeout = rx ? rvq->busyloop_timeout : tvq->busyloop_timeout;
+
+    preempt_disable();
+    endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
+    while (vhost_can_busy_poll(tvq->dev, endtime) &&
+           !(sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk)) &&
+           vhost_vq_avail_empty(tvq->dev, tvq))
+            cpu_relax();
+    preempt_enable();
+
+    if ((rx && !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq)) ||
+        (!rx && (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk)))) {
+            vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+    } else if (vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq) && rx) {
Hmm... on tx here sock has no rx data, so you are waiting for sock
wakeup for rx and vhost_enable_notify() seems not needed. Do you want
this actually?

} else if (rx && vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq)) {
Right, rx need to be checked first here.
thanks, if we dont call the vhost_enable_notify for tx. so we dont
need to call vhost_disable_notify for tx?

@@ -451,7 +451,9 @@ static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
                                               tvq->busyloop_timeout;

         mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
-       vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+
+       if (rx)
+               vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);

         preempt_disable();
         endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;

Sorry for being unclear. We need enable tx notification at end end of the loop.

I meant we need replace

+    } else if (vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq) && rx) {

with

+    } else if (rx && vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq)) {

We only need rx notification when there's no avail buffers. This means we need only enable notification for tx.

And maybe we can simplify the logic as

if (rx) {
......
} else {
......
}

here. (not a must).

Thanks



Thanks

+            vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+            vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+    }

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux