On 26/06/18 18:22, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:13 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ok! >> >> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> What's the planned upstreaming route for these patches/fixes? > > While the fix is mainly for paravirt, 2/3 of the patches exclusively > touch arch/x86, so I think they should go up in the x86 tree (as > opposed to paravirt's), if you would be so kind. hpa mentioned not > handling merges in https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/903, so I reached > out to you and tglx. As there is no paravirt tree the x86 one seems to be appropriate. :-) Juergen _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization