Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018年06月30日 14:33, xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch changes the way that lock all vqs
at the same, to lock them one by one. It will
be used for next patch to avoid the deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 895eaa2..4ca9383 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -294,8 +294,11 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_reset(struct vhost_dev *d)
  {
  	int i;
- for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i) {
+		mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
  		__vhost_vq_meta_reset(d->vqs[i]);
+		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
+	}
  }
static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
@@ -887,20 +890,6 @@ static inline void __user *__vhost_get_user(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
  #define vhost_get_used(vq, x, ptr) \
  	vhost_get_user(vq, x, ptr, VHOST_ADDR_USED)
-static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
-		mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i);
-}
-
-static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
-{
-	int i = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
-		mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
-}
-
  static int vhost_new_umem_range(struct vhost_umem *umem,
  				u64 start, u64 size, u64 end,
  				u64 userspace_addr, int perm)
@@ -950,7 +939,10 @@ static void vhost_iotlb_notify_vq(struct vhost_dev *d,
  		if (msg->iova <= vq_msg->iova &&
  		    msg->iova + msg->size - 1 > vq_msg->iova &&
  		    vq_msg->type == VHOST_IOTLB_MISS) {
+			mutex_lock(&node->vq->mutex);
  			vhost_poll_queue(&node->vq->poll);
+			mutex_unlock(&node->vq->mutex);
+
  			list_del(&node->node);
  			kfree(node);
  		}
@@ -982,7 +974,6 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
  	int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
-	vhost_dev_lock_vqs(dev);
  	switch (msg->type) {
  	case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
  		if (!dev->iotlb) {
@@ -1016,7 +1007,6 @@ static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
  		break;
  	}
- vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(dev);
  	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
return ret;

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux