On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:50:25 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > > > > > > Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to > > > > > > prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover. > > > > > You mean guest changing MAC? I'm not sure why we prohibit that. > > > > I think Sridhar and Jiri might be better person to answer it. My > > > > impression was that sync'ing the MAC address change between all 3 > > > > devices is challenging, as the failover driver uses MAC address to > > > > match net_device internally. > > > > Yes. The MAC address is assigned by the hypervisor and it needs to manage the movement > > of the MAC between the PF and VF. Allowing the guest to change the MAC will require > > synchronization between the hypervisor and the PF/VF drivers. Most of the VF drivers > > don't allow changing guest MAC unless it is a trusted VF. > > OK but it's a policy thing. Maybe it's a trusted VF. Who knows? > For example I can see host just > failing VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET if it wants to block it. > I'm not sure why VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY has to block it in the guest. > So, what I get from this is that QEMU needs to be able to control all of standby, uuid, and mac to accommodate the different setups (respectively have libvirt/management software set it up). Is the host able to find out respectively define whether a VF is trusted? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
