On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 03ed492c4e14..0f4ba52b641d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1421,6 +1421,8 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> * entity (i.e. the master device for bridged veth)
> * @IFF_MACSEC: device is a MACsec device
> * @IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER: device doesn't support the rx_handler hook
> + * @IFF_FAILOVER: device is a failover master device
> + * @IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE: device is lower dev of a failover master device
> */
> enum netdev_priv_flags {
> IFF_802_1Q_VLAN = 1<<0,
> @@ -1450,6 +1452,8 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
> IFF_PHONY_HEADROOM = 1<<24,
> IFF_MACSEC = 1<<25,
> IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER = 1<<26,
> + IFF_FAILOVER = 1<<27,
> + IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE = 1<<28,
> };
Why is FAILOVER any different than other master/slave relationships.
I don't think you need to take up precious netdev flag bits for this.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
