Re: [PATCH net-next v11 2/5] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the failover framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:38:44PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >> In private
> >> >> flag. I don't see no reason to break this pattern here.
> >> >
> >> >Other masters are setup from userspace, this one is set up automatically
> >> >by kernel. So the bar is higher, we need an interface that existing
> >> >userspace knows about.  We can't just say "oh if userspace set this up
> >> >it should know to skip lowerdevs".
> >> >
> >> >Otherwise multiple interfaces with same mac tend to confuse userspace.
> >> 
> >> No difference, really.
> >> Regardless who does the setup, and independent userspace deamon should
> >> react accordingly.
> >
> >If the deamon does the setup itself, it's reasonable to require that it
> >learns about new flags each time we add a new driver.  If it doesn't,
> >then I think it's less reasonable.
> 
> No need. The "IFLA_MASTER" attr is always there to be looked at. That is
> enough.

Oh so if it has an master, skip it? Sorry, I misunderstood what you were
saying earlier.

Thanks, this makes sense to me.

-- 
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux