Re: [RFC v3 3/5] virtio_ring: add packed ring support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018年05月10日 15:32, Jason Wang wrote:


On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
+    /* We're using some buffers from the free list. */
+    vq->vq.num_free -= descs_used;
+
+    /* Update free pointer */
+    if (indirect) {
+        n = head + 1;
+        if (n >= vq->vring_packed.num) {
+            n = 0;
+            vq->wrap_counter ^= 1;
+        }
+        vq->next_avail_idx = n;
+    } else
+        vq->next_avail_idx = i;

During testing zerocopy (out of order completion), I found driver may submit two identical buffer id to vhost. So the above code may not work well.

Consider the case that driver adds 3 buffer and virtqueue size is 8.

a) id = 0,count = 2,next_avail = 2

b) id = 2,count = 4,next_avail = 2

next_avail should be 6 here.


c) id = 4,count = 2,next_avail = 0


id should be 6 here.

Thanks

if packet b is done before packet a, driver may think buffer id 0 is available and try to use it if even if the real buffer 0 was not done.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux