On Wed 25-04-18 18:42:57, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, James Bottomley wrote: [...] > > Kconfig proliferation, conversely, is a bit of a nightmare from both > > the user and the tester's point of view, so we're trying to avoid it > > unless absolutely necessary. > > > > James > > I already offered that we don't need to introduce a new kernel option and > we can bind this feature to any other kernel option, that is enabled in > the debug kernel, for example CONFIG_DEBUG_SG. Michal said no and he said > that he wants a new kernel option instead. Just for the record. I didn't say I _want_ a config option. Do not misinterpret my words. I've said that a config option would be acceptable if there is no way to deliver the functionality via kernel package automatically. You haven't provided any argument that would explain why the kernel package cannot add a boot option. Maybe there are some but I do not see them right now. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
