On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 04/18/2018 07:34 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > The patch 74d332c13b21 changes alloc_netdev_mqs to use vzalloc if kzalloc
> > fails (later patches change it to kvzalloc).
> >
> > The problem with this is that if the vzalloc function is actually used,
> > virtio_net doesn't work (because it expects that the extra memory should
> > be accessible with DMA-API and memory allocated with vzalloc isn't).
> >
> > This patch changes it back to kzalloc and adds a warning if the allocated
> > size is too large (the allocation is unreliable in this case).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 74d332c13b21 ("net: extend net_device allocation to vmalloc()")
> >
> > ---
> > net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/net/core/dev.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/net/core/dev.c 2018-04-16 21:08:36.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6/net/core/dev.c 2018-04-18 16:24:43.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -8366,7 +8366,8 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int
> > /* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct */
> > alloc_size += NETDEV_ALIGN - 1;
> >
> > - p = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> > + WARN_ON(alloc_size > PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER);
> > + p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> > if (!p)
> > return NULL;
> >
> >
>
> Since when a net_device needs to be in DMA zone ???
>
> I would rather fix virtio_net, this looks very suspect to me.
>
> Each virtio_net should probably allocate the exact amount of DMA-memory it wants,
> instead of expecting core networking stack to have a huge chunk of DMA-memory for everything.
The structure net_device is followed by arbitrary driver-specific data
(accessible with the function netdev_priv). And for virtio-net, these
driver-specific data must be in DMA memory.
Mikulas
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
