Re: [RFC v2] virtio: support packed ring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 03:17:41PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:51:33AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:11:58AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年04月13日 15:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:30:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On 2018年04月01日 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > > +static int detach_buf_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> > > > > > +			      void **ctx)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
> > > > > > +	unsigned int i, j;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Clear data ptr. */
> > > > > > +	vq->desc_state[head].data = NULL;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	i = head;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	for (j = 0; j < vq->desc_state[head].num; j++) {
> > > > > > +		desc = &vq->vring_packed.desc[i];
> > > > > > +		vring_unmap_one_packed(vq, desc);
> > > > > > +		desc->flags = 0x0;
> > > > > Looks like this is unnecessary.
> > > > It's safer to zero it. If we don't zero it, after we
> > > > call virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_packed() which calls
> > > > this function, the desc is still available to the
> > > > device.
> > > 
> > > Well detach_unused_buf_packed() should be called after device is stopped,
> > > otherwise even if you try to clear, there will still be a window that device
> > > may use it.
> > 
> > This is not about whether the device has been stopped or
> > not. We don't have other places to re-initialize the ring
> > descriptors and wrap_counter. So they need to be set to
> > the correct values when doing detach_unused_buf.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Tiwei Bie
> 
> find vqs is the time to do it.

The .find_vqs() will call .setup_vq() which will eventually
call vring_create_virtqueue(). It's a different case. Here
we're talking about re-initializing the descs and updating
the wrap counter when detaching the unused descs (In this
case, split ring just needs to decrease vring.avail->idx).

Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux