On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:45:48AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 04/11/2018 06:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:40:02AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> >> To support SCTP checksum offloading, we need to add a new feature
> >> to virtio_net, so we can negotiate support between the hypervisor
> >> and the guest.
> >>
> >> The signalling to the guest that an alternate checksum needs to
> >> be used is done via a new flag in the virtio_net_hdr. If the
> >> flag is set, the host will know to perform an alternate checksum
> >> calculation, which right now is only CRC32c.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >> include/linux/virtio_net.h | 6 ++++++
> >> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 2 ++
Could you pls include a virtio TC mailing list on uapi changes?
> >> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >> index 7b187ec..b601294 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >> @@ -2724,9 +2724,14 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >> /* Do we support "hardware" checksums? */
> >> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
> >> /* This opens up the world of extra features. */
> >> - dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
> >> + netdev_features_t sctp = 0;
> >> +
> >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_SCTP_CSUM))
> >> + sctp |= NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC;
> >> +
> >> + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG | sctp;
> >> if (csum)
> >> - dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
> >> + dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG | sctp;
> >>
> >> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO)) {
> >> dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_TSO
> >> @@ -2952,7 +2957,7 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> >> };
> >>
> >> #define VIRTNET_FEATURES \
> >> - VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM, \
> >> + VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM, VIRTIO_NET_F_SCTP_CSUM, \
> >> VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC, \
> >> VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4, VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UFO, VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6, \
> >> VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6, \
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> >> index f144216..2e7a64a 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> >> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>
> >> if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, start, off))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (hdr->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_CSUM_NOT_INET)
> >> + skb->csum_not_inet = 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (hdr->gso_type != VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE) {
> >> @@ -96,6 +99,9 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> hdr->flags = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID;
> >> } /* else everything is zero */
> >>
> >> + if (skb->csum_not_inet)
> >> + hdr->flags &= VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_CSUM_NOT_INET;
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
> >> index 5de6ed3..3f279c8 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h
> >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM 1 /* Guest handles pkts w/ partial csum */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS 2 /* Dynamic offload configuration. */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU 3 /* Initial MTU advice */
> >> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_SCTP_CSUM 4 /* SCTP checksum offload support */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC 5 /* Host has given MAC address. */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4 7 /* Guest can handle TSOv4 in. */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6 8 /* Guest can handle TSOv6 in. */
> >
> > Is this a guest or a host checksum? We should differenciate between the
> > two.
>
> I suppose this is HOST checksum, since it behaves like VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM only for
> SCTP. I couldn't find the use for the GUEST side flag, since there technically
> isn't any validations and there is no additional mappings from VIRTIO flag to a
> NETIF flag.
>
> If the feature is negotiated, the guest ends up generating partially check-summed
> packets, and the host turns on appropriate flags on it's side. The host will
> also make sure the checksum if fixed up if the guest doesn't support it.
> So 1 flag is currently all that is needed.
>
> -vlad
Fine, but let's include HOST in there to make things clear.
Also I think we should use a high flag, like 62.
> >
> >
> >> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ struct virtio_net_config {
> >> struct virtio_net_hdr_v1 {
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM 1 /* Use csum_start, csum_offset */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID 2 /* Csum is valid */
> >> +#define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_CSUM_NOT_INET 4 /* Checksum is not inet */
> >> __u8 flags;
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE 0 /* Not a GSO frame */
> >> #define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV4 1 /* GSO frame, IPv4 TCP (TSO) */
> >> --
> >> 2.9.5
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
