On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:44:47 -0700 Siwei Liu <loseweigh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700 > >> Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic > >> > bypass infrastructure. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > >> Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper > >> issues. > >> > >> First, the slave device is instantly taking over the slave. > >> This doesn't allow udev/systemd to do its device rename of the slave > >> device. Netvsc uses a delayed work to workaround this. > > > > Interesting. Does this mean udev must act within a specific time window > > then? > > Sighs, lots of hacks. Why propgating this from driver to a common > module. We really need a clean solution. > I had a patch to wait for udev to do the rename and go from there but davem rejected it. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
